OT Programme Design & Delivery.
Most OT security programmes don't fail at strategy. They fail somewhere between board approval and the plant floor. We design programmes that survive contact with running operations — and then we deliver them alongside your teams.
Engineered by us. Owned by you.
01 · The gap in the market
Everyone will write you a roadmap. Almost nobody will run it.
There is no shortage of OT security advice. There is a severe shortage of people who can hold a programme together through a shutdown, a safety case, a change freeze and a vendor dispute — and still land the control that was promised to the board. That is the gap, and it is where programmes die.
Big-four consultancies
Strategy without a plant floor
A polished target operating model, a maturity heatmap, and a delivery phase that quietly becomes your problem. The people who wrote it have never taken a line out of service.
We design it and then deliver it.
System integrators
Delivery without accountability for risk
Excellent at installing what they were told to install. Less willing to challenge whether it reduces operational risk, or to own the outcome when it does not.
We own the outcome, not the scope of supply.
IT security functions
Controls that break production
Enterprise patterns pushed into an environment that cannot tolerate them. Agents on assets that must not be touched. Programmes stalled by an engineer’s legitimate “no”.
We translate both ways, credibly.
In-house OT teams
Capacity, not capability
They usually know exactly what needs doing. What they lack is the bandwidth, the programme discipline and the board-facing evidence to get it funded and finished.
We add hands, not headcount.
02 · What we do
Design the programme. Then stay for the delivery.
We take responsibility for the whole arc: the evidence that justifies the spend, the architecture and standards that make it coherent, the plan that respects maintenance windows and safety cases, and the hands-on delivery that turns it into commissioned, operable control.
Then we hand it over properly — documented, tested, and owned by the people who run the plant. Built in, not bolted on.
Board to floor · one accountable team
Six workstreams. One programme.
03 · How we deliver
Five stages. Each one ends in something operable.
04 · What you get
Deliverables that outlive the engagement.
05 · Why Nuvantiq
The instincts of operators, not the theory of advisors.
01
We have run plants, not just projects
Our engineers have written the PLC code and recovered the plant. That credibility is why operations lets us near the process.
02
Operational risk is the unit of measure
We argue in lost production, unsafe states and downtime with real consequence — not control counts and CVSS scores.
03
One accountable team, board to floor
The same people write the business case, defend it to the board, and stand on the plant floor at commissioning.
04
Engineered by us, owned by them
Success is your team operating what we built, confidently, after we have gone. No dependency, no alphabet soup, no vendor speak.
For the board & the CISO
You have approved investment and need evidence it is landing. We give you a programme with defensible scope, measurable milestones and regulatory alignment — CAF, NIS2, IEC 62443, CRA — reported in the language of operational consequence rather than control counts.
For engineering & operations
You have a plant to run and no appetite for security theatre. We work to your change process, your windows and your safety case — and we leave you controls you can operate, document and defend without calling us back.
Resilience isn't inherited. It's engineered.
Bring us the programme that has stalled, or the one you haven't started.
We will tell you plainly what it takes to land it.
Or email Info@nuvantiq.com.